WebJun 13, 2014 · Yesterday the Supreme Court issued a decision in POM Wnonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Company, a case involving allegations of misleading food and beverage labels. The Court ruled that federal FDA regulations and private Lanham Act claims complement each other, and that POM’s Lanham Act claim therefore was not preempted or barred by … WebJun 12, 2014 · June 12, 2014. The Court held that competitors may bring Lanham Act claims alleging unfair competition from false or misleading product descriptions on food and …

Pom Wonderful, LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company - Case Briefs - 2013

WebMay 17, 2012 · No. 10–55861. 2012-05-17. POM WONDERFUL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The COCA–COLA COMPANY, a Delaware … WebJun 12, 2014 · Coca-Cola Company makes a juice blend with a label that prominently displays the words "pomegranate" and "blueberry" but contains only 0.3 percent pomegranate juice and 0.2 percent blueberry juice. POM Wonderful brought a Lanham Act claim against Coca-Cola, alleging that Coca-Cola's label was deceptive and misleading … black and blue bird time signature

Supreme Court rules against Coca-Cola in juice dispute CNN

WebPom Wonderful v. Coca-Cola - Court of Appeals - 9th Circuit - U.S. ... EN. English Deutsch Français Español Português Italiano Român Nederlands Latina Dansk Svenska Norsk Magyar Bahasa Indonesia Türkçe Suomi Latvian Lithuanian česk ... WebPOM Wonderful believed this was deceptive advertising and filed a lawsuit against Coca-Cola. The company claimed Coca-Cola's promotional claims violated the Lanham Act as the name, label, marketing, and advertising of Coca-Cola's juice blend misled consumers as to its actual content, thereby causing POM to lose sales. WebSep 10, 2024 · POM Wonderful LLC v. CocaCola Co., 573 U.S. (2014), is a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court which holds that a statutory private right of action under … black and blue birds types